Change Management for Manufacturing Process Planning (MPP)
Hello all, I am currently investigation best-practices for Change Management (CM) related to manufacturing process plans (MPP). There is a lot of information available on CM of Parts and (CAD) Documents, but not so much about updating the related Process Plans. I am wondering if anyone is willing to share their opinion and recommendations for revising Process Plans. Do you manage MPP changes separately or is it part of your MBOM configuration? What initiates an MPP change? Engineering Change > Manufacturing Change > Process Plan Change? Document > Process Plan Step > Process Plan Change? Any other? What Aras ItemType do you use as change container (ECN, ECO, ECR, etc.)? I hope we can have an open discussion to learn more from each other! Best regards, Daan0Views0likes3CommentsTrack the fields/properties in Aras like History Container
Hello Experts, Is there any way in the Aras to check which property is modified while updating the Item? I have part item and while updating, i wanted to check which properties are modified likewise it is given in History page. E.g I have the properties in the Part as Name, Item Number, Description, Classification etc. User tried to update the Name and Description so i wanted to know that only these two properties are changed. If i enable the track history for these 2 properties then i can see the modified properties details in the History page. I want this information of properties on item type server events like, OnBeforeUpdate, OnAfterUpdate etc.2.9KViews0likes2CommentsChange ItemType and Affected Item
Good day all. I am working on modifying our change ItemTypes (don't use the OOTB ones). I have been looking at the Simple ECO as an example. Our current changes are associated to a single document/part. So if someone is updating a drawing that affects a part, they would have to submit two changes, it gets worse if this affects multiple things. I would like to modify (or create a new ItemType) these changes to have the Affected Items tab. I have been testing this with a custom ItemType, but am running into problems with the Has Changes getting updated. I looked at Changes Pending in Part post and saw that there were a few Methods that I needed to look at. I modified the Methods PE_update_has_change_pending and PE_ChangeItemTransition to include my change ItemType, but my test document will not get marked as Change Pending. I tested the Simple ECO and it does mark the document. Thank you for any help you can provide.Solved5.6KViews1like6CommentsGet item_number of Change Item in PE_ChangeItemTransition
Hi Community, does anybody know how to get the current Change Process item (basically it´s item_number, like ECO-10001) within the PE_ChangeItemTransition Method? I want to modify the private static void PromoteImpl part around line 5297. This part of the code takes care for the promotion of the change item. It contains this line of code: Item res = promoteItem.promote(nextStatus, "Promote set"); I want to add more information to the history entry that is created by this promotion action. It would be cool if Innovator could write more into the history than just "Promote set". It would be more helpful if we could have "Promote set by ECO-10001". But for this purpose we need to pass the ECO information to the function. But I am not sure were to get this one. Any ideas? Thanks! AngelaSolved3.1KViews0likes1CommentWhat´s the best way to track Manfacturer Part Changes in a Simple MCO in a more detailed way?
Hi Community, maybe somebody is also interested in this use case. We use the Simple MCO to change Manfacturer Parts of released Parts outside the regular Part lifecycle. One typical use case is the exchange of an Manfacturer Part. For example the Part has a Manufacturer Part with PN "391443". The Simple MCO can be used to exchange this one easily with a new Manufacturer Part with PN "124391". But right now the standard Simple MCO doesn´t offer a OOTB way to track the Manfacturer Part change itself. If users don´t describe the change in the Simple MCO Form manually, it´s not possible to track what have changed. The affected Part itself will only show the latest Manufacturer Part, but the Simple MCO doesn´t help us to find the previous one. The Simple MCO will just indicate that a change happend, but it doesn´t force user to explicity describe the changes made to the AML. Another Pitfall: The AML changes performed with the AML Editor in the Simple MCO are immediately visible in the Part. If user make an mistake and forget about the previous Part (because they didn´t mentioned it in the MCO Form description and the review needs two week), it´s hard to revert the AML without a lot of research. I would prefer, if we could use an customized AML Editor for planning and documentation of the change. The change shall apply when the Simple MCO is released, but not in real-time while using the MCO. Well, that are my current ideas. Does anybody face a simliar requirement or has some additional ideas how to improve the Simple MCO? Thanks for any ideas! Angela1.3KViews0likes0Comments