How to avoid wrong revision used in MPP?
Hi Community,
there is a known issue in MPP that the application will not check if the MBOM uses the same Part revisions as specified in the EBOM. The EBOM/MOBM mainly validates quantities, but nev...
Forum Discussion
Hi,
I'm intersted on the MPP module and would definitely get some information from Aras on this (or from the community of course).
Best Regards,
Sacha Bertschi
Hi Sacha,
unfortunately MPP has only low priority for Aras. The roadmap is mainly driven by a few target customers, who don´t use Innovator as main PLM suite. So we will not see any improvements in MPP in the near future.
The MBOM/EBOM conversion in MPP works fine. That´s the good part of the app. But I wouldn´t recommend people to use the ProcessPlan editor. You have to spend a lot of time to make things working and it´s still hard to use for the end user. For example one big problem is the way images are handled. When you use the default configuration already small amount of images in your ProcessPlan can lead to a server breakdown (no I am not kidding). It´s not a question if you get performance problem, only the question when. So you have to fix a lot of elementary stuff first. MPP could be a very cool and powerful application. But right now - it just isn´t.
