John Pilla "T his course is comprised of five units to describe the process that might exist ..." I see more than five "units" in this navigation panel. Also, one of the "five" Problem Discovery is not in the navigation panel. Perhaps just take out…

John Pilla " People can easily view content, add markups and make comments in the context of PLM items using visual collaboration in Aras Innovator 11." Remove Innovator version (11).

John Pilla Remove redundant header at top of page. Recommend a graphic to show the tabs being described in the text. I fixed minor typo in Outgoing Links paragraph. This paragraph is mostly a repeat of the previous paragraphs. Would it work ok…

John Pilla Recommend removing the "The Requirement Document Editor View" header and the sentence following it. Recommend adding an inline link in the first Try it to the Creating a Requirements Document page. I fixed typo "ad" to "add".

John Pilla Recommend removing the Requirements Documents header. Recommend adding (required) after the Managed By and Title bullets

John Pilla It's not clear in this graphic where to see the Type (Classification) shown as required in the bullet list. The 2nd bullet in the relationships makes it look like there is a tab titled Requirements Related Parts " The Requirements Related…

John Pilla The "Requirement Content" header should be removed. The "TDF supports..." bullet in the first list can be removed since you have the details in the next paragraph. It would be good to add an inline link to the Creating a Requirement page…

John Pilla The first header "Requirements" could be removed. The bullet point " The Requirements Related Parts tab allows them to be linked to a Part" makes it sound like there is a tab with that exact title. Recommend removing "Requirements"

John Pilla I would remove the 2 sub headings. Also, I think the option is "New Requirement" not "Create new Requirement" in the 2nd paragraph.

John Pilla In general, throughout the RE pages, the words Requirement Document and Requirements Document are both used. Is this correct or should all of them be Requirements Document(s)?

John Pilla I see that you added a paragraph here. The first one can be removed since it is a duplicate as Darrell mentioned.

John Pilla I would replace the first sentence and 3 bullet points with the first paragraph text from pg 6 of the RE document. Then you wouldn't be duplicating information by mixing bullets from the graphic and the page text.

John Pilla The second header "Requirements Engineering (RE)" could probably be removed. The first paragraph needs to be " Aras Requirements Engineering" (missing the s) and (RE) could be added here if the 2nd header is removed. Remove duplicate bullet…